Anamnesis

What?

  • Anamnesis is the art of taking a patient’s history: helping someone recall and tell the story needed to understand illness. It gathers information while bringing a narrative to light and building a relationship. Structure matters, but can tempt us into a checklist mindset.
  • A good history explores disease, personal identity and coping. It attends to the patient’s ideas, concerns and expectations, and to how illness has changed their life. Telling and hearing a story can itself be part of healing.

So What?

  • A careful history helps the physician make an accurate diagnosis and a fitting treatment plan. It also shows how illness has affected this patient’s life. Assumptions, interruptions and hurried documentation can leave important information unheard.
  • Listening helps the physician understand the patient’s values and earn their trust. These conversations can also bring joy and purpose back to daily practice.

Now What?

  • Ask open-ended questions and let the patient finish. Allow a pause before the next question; follow their line of thought, clarify uncertainties and preserve their own words rather than steering toward an expected answer.
  • Ask how illness has affected the patient and what they most fear. Develop attention to narrative through good literature, conversation, reflection and writing. Seek feedback from teachers, including on how your own assumptions and role shape the encounter.

Clinical Case

You are a PGY-1 psychiatry resident on a busy admitting service at a psychiatric hospital. Your job is to take the history and come up with an initial diagnosis and treatment plan, while making sure that you ask all the necessary questions to document for safety / regulatory / billing purposes. Some of the PGY-2s have told you this rotation is a great place to practice efficiency, and that now they can do a full admission in under an hour, whereas you have been taking three to four hours.

You are asked to evaluate a 19 year old man who brought himself to the ED for suicidal thoughts and anxiety for the last few months since starting college. You note that he carries a provisional diagnosis of “F32.9: Unspecified depressive disorder”.

The patient is a thin young man, unkempt, tired-appearing, and wrapped in a hospital blanket. He gives short, 1-2 word replies to most of your questions, which is ideal for getting through the requisite ROS in under 3 minutes. As you expected, he endorses all the neurovegetative symptoms of depression (SIGECAPS), denies all the mania symptoms (DIGFAST), and denies hearing voices or seeing things.

You conclude the interview and staff the case with your attending. She listens attentively and nods understandingly as you recite your formulation: “His presentation is most consistent with a major depressive episode with anxious distress...” She suggests that the two of you go back and see the patient together.

Back in the room with the patient, the attending asks him, “What’s on your mind?” The patient stares at her in silence, and you can’t help looking at the clock and remembering that you still have to put in the admission orders and finish your note. The attending waits, and after almost a minute, the patient replies, “It’s hard to explain.”

“Tell me more”, the attending replies, expressing genuine curiosity.

After another long pause, the patient says, “My roommate...”

Another pause. “Your roommate?” echoes the attending.

And you watch as the patient begins to open up, describing how he suspects that his roommate is reading his thoughts, and that sometimes he can’t tell which thoughts are his own. As he finishes speaking, you notice his grip on the blanket has loosened just a bit.

Discussion Questions

  • What did the first interview accomplish, and what did it miss? How did the resident’s motivations shape it?
  • What differed in the attending’s approach? Why might the patient have withheld this story earlier?
  • Where does pressure for efficiency come from? When is it reasonable, and when does it narrow attention?
  • Can history-taking itself be therapeutic? What might the loosened grip signify?
  • How could the provisional diagnosis shape expectations? How can clinicians remain open to a different story?

Sources

Sources: LearnWorlds lessons and the earlier Canva one-pager.

Concept outline

Clinical cases and discussion

Putting it into practice

Loading...

0:00 / 0:00